Comments on: Review: Street Photography NOW http://streetreverbmagazine.com/books/review-street-photography-now/ Dedicated to promoting, publishing and discussing contemporary street photography. Sun, 08 Jan 2012 16:19:57 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2 By: C LIVSEY http://streetreverbmagazine.com/books/review-street-photography-now/#comment-22 C LIVSEY Sun, 17 Jul 2011 20:04:00 +0000 http://streetreverbmagazine.com/?p=456#comment-22 No replies  to your quiz ? Koudelka "fireworks" appears in both all be it as a "thumbnail" in Now. Interesting they quote it as 1973 but Bystander has it as 1971 as do all the other sources I have checked. No replies  to your quiz ?

Koudelka “fireworks” appears in both all be it as a “thumbnail” in Now. Interesting they quote it as 1973 but Bystander has it as 1971 as do all the other sources I have checked.

]]> By: Wendy Ploger http://streetreverbmagazine.com/books/review-street-photography-now/#comment-289 Wendy Ploger Fri, 12 Nov 2010 14:44:00 +0000 http://streetreverbmagazine.com/?p=456#comment-289 Surprisingly, I first heard of the book when I stumbled upon it in a small bookstore in Brooklyn - no computers involved. Bought it, love it. Even my friends who aren't tuned in to the street photography genre love it as well. And now I'm enjoying the response I see online. Surprisingly, I first heard of the book when I stumbled upon it in a small bookstore in Brooklyn – no computers involved. Bought it, love it. Even my friends who aren’t tuned in to the street photography genre love it as well. And now I’m enjoying the response I see online.

]]> By: Athena Kardianou http://streetreverbmagazine.com/books/review-street-photography-now/#comment-288 Athena Kardianou Fri, 12 Nov 2010 13:36:00 +0000 http://streetreverbmagazine.com/?p=456#comment-288 Nice presentation Bryan and very cohesive. I have bought the book and I was mostly thrilled with the new "discoveries". The reproduction is very good indeed. I am passionate about street photography as much as you are, both as an advocate and as a photographer, but I think the most frequent criticism about the genre is the absence of, in most cases, profound content that can lift a body of work into a meaningful narrative. I'm not implying that this is the case, but this is what makes street photography really tough contrary to the widely perceived notion that is easy. And now a small quiz for the people who have read SPN and the Bystander. Which is the only photograph that's been reproduced in both books? Nice presentation Bryan and very cohesive. I have bought the book and I was mostly thrilled with the new “discoveries”. The reproduction is very good indeed. I am passionate about street photography as much as you are, both as an advocate and as a photographer, but I think the most frequent criticism about the genre is the absence of, in most cases, profound content that can lift a body of work into a meaningful narrative.
I’m not implying that this is the case, but this is what makes street photography really tough contrary to the widely perceived notion that is easy.
And now a small quiz for the people who have read SPN and the Bystander. Which is the only photograph that’s been reproduced in both books?

]]>